FOUNDATIONAL RESEARCH

Shining Light takes an multidisciplinary approach to program development and implementation,
integrating a wide range of leading research and reports.
 

EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS IN SHINING LIGHT PROGRAMS

  • Within prisons, gratitude interventions have been shown to decrease aggression (Deng et al., 2019), increase subjective well-being (Deng et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2018), and increase satisfaction of basic psychological needs (Peng et al., 2021). A meta- analysis (the strongest quality of evidence in research) revealed that gratitude predicts prosocial behavior (Ma et al., 2017). Subjective well-being is important because research on mental health, beyond just the alleviation of mental illness, from a large sample of violent offenders showed that the better their mental health was inside and upon returning home, the less likely they were to recidivate (Wallace & Wang, 2020). 

    • 24 of the 25 sessions in the Shining Light Academy (SLA) have participants practice an evidence-based gratitude intervention. 

    • SLA Foundations Course graduates report a 34% increase in gratitude. 

    • Positive News From Inside a section in The Loop asks readers to engage in a gratitude- sharing exercise.

  • A systematic review of Character Strengths interventions found positive outcomes for well- being, job outcomes, personal growth initiative, and group/team outcomes (Ghielen et al., 2017). Awareness and use of strengths strongly correlate with psychological well-being (Hone et al., 2015) and character strengths interventions have shown to increase psychological well-being, decrease depression (Schutte & Malouff, 2019), and prompt behavior change (Bates Krakoff et al., 2022). 

    • 6 sessions in the SLA specifically focus on Character Strengths and strength awareness in oneself and others is encouraged throughout all 25 sessions. 

    • 95% of graduates of the SLA Foundations Course indicate a greater awareness of strengths in themselves or others. 

    • Each issue of The Loop revolves around one of the 24 Character Strengths. Inside, readers find various articles exploring how to apply that strength in different areas of life. These articles cover topics like strength spotting, ways to develop the strength further, and creative exercises tailored to that specific strength. 

    • Two video courses found on tablets, the SL Learn Your Strengths and Apply Your Strengths series, dive into Character Strengths and focus on increasing the awareness of strengths and the intentional development of them generally and looking at self- regulation and gratitude specifically. Viewers engage with these courses individually and individuals inside have developed multi-week courses utilizing the series.

  • Research has shown that participation in arts education and practice can increase emotional control, decrease disciplinary reports, and increase the motivation to pursue educational and vocational programming (Brewster, 2014). Additional research has confirmed that arts engagement positively correlates with prosocial behavior (Kuo et al., 2019). 

    • 10 of the sessions focus on creative writing in a variety of forms including free writing, poetry (haiku, limericks, and sonnets), and co-writing a play as a group. 

    • 97% SLA Foundations Course graduates would recommend the program to a friend. 

    • Inside The Loop, there are two sections featuring Creative Writing prompts to inspire readers to write freely and explore poetry related to the theme. Each issue features examples of impressive submissions from other readers in the previous issue. 

    • Two video courses found on tablets, the SL Playwriting Lab and Spoken Word Lab, provide introductory skills to these forms of creative writing. Viewers engage with these courses individually and in group settings.

  • Within prisons hope interventions have been shown to decrease depression and increase solution-focused decision-making (Sinaga et al., 2020). A systematic review of existing research highlighted that hope predicts the likelihood of people seeking social support, altruism, community and social participation, and prosocial behavior (Schornick et al., 2023). 

    • 9 sessions in the SLA have participants practice hope where they specifically think of the future in a positive way and pathways to get there. In addition, formerly incarcerated facilitators role model a positive future for participants. 

    • Graduates of SLA Foundations Course report a 32% increase in Hope. 

    • Within The Loop, there are multiple articles written by formerly incarcerated individuals and one article entitled Community Spotlight, that specifically highlights someone who has returned home and is thriving.

  • Within prisons, positive psychology skill-building interventions have shown to increase gratitude, hope, and life satisfaction (Huynh, 2015) and to increase positive relationships and purpose in life (Tabatabaee, 2016). 

    • 2 sessions in the SLA focus on more general Positive Psychology Skills including SMART goal-setting and Active-Constructive Responding. 

    • Graduates of the SLA Foundations Course report a 27% increase in prosocial intention. Depending on the issue of The Loop, different positive psychology skills are featured. For example, SMART goal-setting and Active-Constructive Responding have both been reviewed in different issues. What skills get highlighted depends on theme of the issue.

  • A systematic review of existing research on the effects of WRAP found participating in the training increased participants understanding and engagement with one's mental health and improved communications with professionals (Canacott et al., 2020). 

    • 6 sessions of the SLA incorporate the WRAP program in the SLA. 

    • Graduates of the SLA Foundations Course report a 44% increase in Self-Worth.

  • A systematic review of peer interventions in prisons settings found that peer-led interventions can lower risky behaviors and can have a positive effect on participants (Bagnall et al., 2015). Additional studies have found that incarceration history is the most important peer characteristic and suggest that individuals who are successful in re-entry are well-positioned to assist, advise, and mentor their peers (Matthews, 2021). 

    • The majority, and usually all, of the sessions in the SLA Foundations course have formerly incarcerated facilitators. 

    • Multiple sections of The Loop are written by formerly incarcerated writers and over half of the content comes from submsisions to prompts and activities from the previous issue. This capitalizes on peer experience and wisdom on how to engage with the Character Strength within a similar environment.

  • Within a prison environment, there have been several studies on the use of video conferencing as a delivery method for psychological treatment options showing equivalent effectiveness (Batastini et al., 2016; Morgan et al., 2008) and one study finding equivalent effectiveness in the use of video conferencing to run Thinking For A Change, a cognitive behavioral education program offered in a prison context with a similar format to the SLA Foundations Course (LaPlant, 2020). 

    • All 25 sessions can be facilitated via Video Conference. 

    • Graduates of the SLA Foundations Course gave the program a rating of 4.9/5.

MENTAL HEALTH
EFFECTS ON:

    • Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (the strongest form of evidence) have concluded that students with stronger mental health are more likely to achieve academic success(Bas, 2021;Kaya & Erdem, 2021). 

    • Importantly, when well-being skills are taught in an academic environment, they can lead to both increased well-being and improved academic performance(Adler, 2017).

    • Researchers have discovered that students who experience more positive emotions are more engaged in school (King et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2009).

    • Hope is another predictor of multiple positive academic outcomes, including GPA (Marques, Gallagher, & Lopez, 2017).

    • A meta-analysis concluded that better mental health, especially more positive emotion and less negative emotion, is a better predictor for job performance as compared to:

      • Interviews

      • In-basket tests

      • Cognitive abilities

      • Emotional Intelligence

      • Situational Judgment

      • The Big Five personality dimension

      • Cognitive abilities (Moscoso & Salgado, 2021).

    • The skills that build psychological well-being are different from the skills that alleviate suffering (Seligman, 2011).

    • In addition, a study looking at Cognitive Behavioral Therapy found that the more positive emotions someone had going into CBT, the more positive changes they would see from the treatment (Taylor et al., 2017).

    • Better mental health predicts lower recidivism. More specifically, when someone has good mental health vs. poor mental health in prison, their likelihood of recidivism goes down by 8%  (Wallace & Wanger, 2020).

PROGRAM ASPECTS:

References

Batastini, A. B., King, C. M., Morgan, R. D., & McDaniel, B. (2016). Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services, 13(1), 20. 

Bates-Krakoff, J., Parente, A., McGrath, R., Rashid, T., & Niemiec, R. (2022). Are character strength-based positive interventions effective for eliciting positive behavioral outcomes? A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Wellbeing, 12(3). 

Brewster, L. (2014). The Impact of Prison Arts Programs on Inmate Attitudes and Behavior: A Quantitative Evaluation. Justice Policy Journal, 11(2). 

Canacott, L., Tickle, A., & Moghaddam, N. (2020). Perceptions of wellness recovery action plan (WRAP) training: a systematic review and metasynthesis. Mental Health Review Journal, 25(4), 345-366. 

Deng, Y., Xiang, R., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, X. (2019). Counting blessings and sharing gratitude in a Chinese prisoner sample: Effects of gratitude-based interventions on subjective well-being and aggression. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(3), 303-311. 

Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573-585. 

Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., Duncan, S., & Schofield, G. M. (2015). Flourishing in New Zealand workers: Associations with lifestyle behaviors, physical health, psychosocial, and work-related indicators. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(9), 973-983. 

Huynh, K. H., Hall, B., Hurst, M. A., & Bikos, L. H. (2015). Evaluation of the positive re-entry in corrections program: A positive psychology intervention with prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(9), 1006-1023. 

Kou, X., Konrath, S., & Goldstein, T. R. (2020). The relationship among different types of arts engagement, empathy, and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(4), 481. 

LaPlant, E. G., Bellair, P. E., Kowalski, B. R., Addison, D., & Starr, S. (2021). Assessing the delivery of the thinking for a change program in modified formats: An experimental approach. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 65(8), 832-857. 

Ma, L. K., Tunney, R. J., & Ferguson, E. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 143(6), 601. 

Matthews, E. (2021). Peer-focused prison reentry programs: Which peer characteristics matter most?. Incarceration, 2(2), 26326663211019958. 

Morgan, R. D., Patrick, A. R., & Magaletta, P. R. (2008). Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates' perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 158. 

Peng, J., Xiao, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Huang, Q., & Shao, Y. (2021). Benefits of counting blessings in basic psychological needs satisfaction and subjective well-being of prisoners. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(2), 198-213. 

Schornick, Z., Ellis, N., Ray, E., Snyder, B. J., & Thomas, K. (2023). Hope that benefits others: a systematic literature review of Hope theory and prosocial outcomes. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 8(1), 37-61. 

Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of happiness studies, 20, 1179-1196. 

Sinaga, M. R. E., Andriany, M., & Nurrahima, A. (2020). Effect of group-based hope intervention on depression in female inmates. Belitung Nursing Journal, 6(4), 116-121. 

Tabatabaee, S. M., Albooyeh, G., Safari, H., & Rajabppor, M. (2016). The effect of positive psychology intervention on psychological well- being of drugs inmates. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 8-14. 

Wallace, D., & Wang, X. (2020). Does in-prison physical and mental health impact recidivism?. SSM-population health, 11, 100569. 

Yang, Y., Zhao, H., Aidi, M., & Kou, Y. (2018). Three good deeds and three blessings: The kindness and gratitude interventions with Chinese prisoners. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(5), 433-441.